Feminists aren’t losing their way at all, Victoria
June 19, 2011 1 Comment
Today Victoria Coren asks “Are slutwalkers losing their way?“
In short: No. Though it has to be clarified that there is a kind of conflation between ‘feminists’ and ‘SlutWalkers’. They are not necessarily the same people. Pedantry aside, there are several things I have an issue with in the piece – I’ll pick out the two most obvious bits that I disagree with.
Firstly, she mentions Ken Clarke and his proposals to cut sentences in half if rapists plead guilty early on:
That’s why Ken Clarke is right to want slashed sentencing for early pleas of guilt and such a shame the argument disappeared in the row over his sloppy language.
I see an issue with Clarke’s proposed reform in terms of the direct effect of imprisonment on those who rape – rehabilitation (longer explanation as to what prison is supposed to do but largely I’d say rehabilitation and integration back into society is key). If the average sentence for a rapist is 8 years (though the figures seem to suggest it is longer than this – there is no alternative figure put forward, though) then under these reforms the sentence would be 4 years. Is this enough time for effective rehabilitation? I did see some figures somewhere about rehabilitation only being effective over a certain amount of time – I don’t have them to hand right now, and I can’t remember where they came from (were they to be trusted? Perhaps not).
From what limited discourse I saw – the justification for Clarke’s reform proposals were not really robust enough. Sure, it would spare the victim the horror of reliving their experience. But in the interests of justice being carried out – ie preventing rapists from raping again, will halving sentences (and thus halving time in which to rehabilitate) help at all?
On the Playboy Club protest:
I am a feminist; I think feminism is about free choice, independence and solidarity; of course I believe that women should wear whatever they like and I say that only a hypocrite would march in hotpants one day and rail against croupiers in rabbit tails the next.
She’s missed the point here. It’s not about the clothes, it’s about the fact that most of the women who work there will not be doing so in absolute free choice as we would assume. No, of course they aren’t being smuggled into the club, but there is a culture of supposed ‘free choice’ in terms of womens’ choices, propagated by those who would benefit, ie. men and the sex industry. Young women today grow up feeling that the only way to succeed is through using their bodies, seeing themselves as sex objects. And what’s worse is it’s sold to these women as “empowerment”. Empowerment is only found where you make your true choices. As far as I’m concerned it is a false dichotomy to suggest that women would go into the sex industry or do that sort of thing out of pure free choice – ie without some pushing agenda that has forced them to. What woman would willingly choose to face the threat of sexual harassment, degradation and even violence, on a daily basis? A woman who has the self-confidence to achieve whatever she wants? Or a woman who has nothing to lose because she feels like she is worthless anyway?
How do I know that this is more or less a universal truth? Because I have grown up feeling like this. I am not the way that I ‘should’ be, so I am worth nothing. Why would anyone want me when they could have someone who is skinny, blonde, has beautiful skin and doesn’t argue back or (seem to) resist? Why would you want someone who is un-mouldable, when you have hundreds of thousands who are – by virtue of the fact that they epitomise ‘womanhood’; what it means to be a woman, in society’s view?
People like me have been told their whole lives that they are worth nothing – because we dare to stray from what is socially acceptable behaviour. This is what SlutWalk was about. Women should be free to do what they want – and honestly, if they genuinely want to be a playboy bunny or whatever (when given other options and the self-confidence and self-esteem to feel they can make a valid choice!), then that’s their prerogative – but I don’t think that half of them would be there if they had some other aspirations other than what the cult of celebrity helps trot out: “Be famous” “Bag a footballer” “Everyone’s got dodgy old pornographic photos so it’s fine” “Boob jobs are essential for getting ahead” “Men want tits and arse” “No pain, no gain” “Women are good for looking at and not much else”…
I didn’t protest at the club. I didn’t even go to SlutWalk in the end – partially for semantic reasons – but mostly due to unavailability. I am against the Playboy Club in itself; not the women who work there. There’s a false dichotomy at play here, that those who work there do so out of choice, and to be empowered. I’m quite disappointed that Victoria is buying into the same old arguments trotted out at every given opportunity. Empowerment is achieved through doing things for yourself, out of your own free choice – not through doing what other people have told you you are only useful for.
Recent Comments