The politics of not voting
May 5, 2012 1 Comment
I didn’t vote in the local elections, and this apparently means I am a prime target for spontaneous abuse on Twitter. “You didn’t vote, you can’t moan”, “You’re part of the problem”, and so on.
As it happened, my not-voting was not actually a political statement – I don’t have faith in the political system but I still usually bother voting, because in a world where one tick in a box every few years does actually have a significant effect on you (however resentful that is; and it is), I think it’s important to participate. Not that I really need to justify my position but I had come back from holiday the night before, been given some bad news about my family, and I was working that night – I was too busy to be concerned about something I am not especially passionate about. It literally just slipped my mind and I forgot – I didn’t see any of the papers referring to the elections and frankly, it speaks volumes that someone such as I (who has enjoyed and exercised my right to vote since I could) would simply ‘forget’ to vote.
I said last night on one of my twitter accounts that the election was ridiculous, and that the election figures themselves were ridiculous. It is evidently unthinkable that I could possibly say such a thing, because I hadn’t voted myself.
Quick explanation of what a ‘right’ is, for those who are confused: A right is something you have the option to do. This means you also have the right to not do it. It is not compulsory – that would be forcing people to vote, and in itself, by definition that is authoritarian and not ideal really (think of all the uninformed voters you’ll have!) I have the right to enter into a civil partnership with a woman. Does this mean I have to? No. Does this make me homophobic if I don’t? Er, no. You see where it becomes problematic berating people for not exercising their rights?
Not to mention that it’s heavily ironic that people are exercising their right to free speech to tell me I need to exercise my right to vote, otherwise I have no right to free speech. The mind boggles at this level of logic.
What we should be doing, rather than berating and dismissing people who do not vote, is engage them. Why do they not vote? What would make them vote? This is far more constructive and instructive when we look at low turn out – maybe we could start by asking, why is low turn-out a problem? In other countries where turn-out is higher, why is low turn-out not such a problem? Does compulsory voting really work? How can you better inform people? Can you make the voting process easier – vote by text, by tweet, by email, or on the phone – less effort for people who don’t have the time to go down to the polling station? What classes are most unlikely to vote – what gender, what races – why aren’t they being engaged? Are we speaking to all aspects of the community or just a single slice? We should be asking these questions rather than dismissing the majority of people (who didn’t vote) as apathetic or uninterested. Maybe we should be interested in what they have to say.
For my part, it slipped my mind because none of the candidates grabbed my imagination – it was 2008 all over again, and I knew that Boris would get back in. I couldn’t particularly think of anyone I’d rather vote for. Give a man the choice of which way to die, and he’ll gladly pick one. But he’s still going to die, which he doesn’t want at all. It’s a false choice. I feel the same about elections, really. Which flavour of shit sandwich would I most like to chow down on? Hooray for democracy.
Recent Comments